GitHub / Dependency Review / Dependabot
Package identity, installed version, vulnerable range, manifest, scope and relationship in this repository.
GitHub-native release control
Limen combines repository context, independent security evidence, and deterministic policy to decide whether code should ship — then keeps blocked releases on a path toward verified remediation.
PASS, HOLD, or REVIEW is the decision. Verified remediation is the loop that closes it.
The release threshold
It doesn't know whether the release has enough evidence to proceed.
A scanner can identify a vulnerability. A CVE source can provide vulnerability facts. Neither alone answers whether this specific repository release should proceed.
Limen sits at that threshold.
One decision, distinct roles
Repository context, routed CVE evidence and release policy stay visible without becoming one opaque signal.
Package identity, installed version, vulnerable range, manifest, scope and relationship in this repository.
A separately routed signal with provenance, cost, latency and the evidence fields it returned.
limen.ymlThe repository declares what blocks a release and what uncertainty must go to human review.
The result is explicit, not implied.
Real proof
Inspect the public receipt for the full sanitized evidence path.
HOLD / kaelah971/limen-demo
PR #1 · lodash@4.17.20Three possible states
Continue the release. PASS is not a universal security guarantee.
Stop, patch the dependency or deliberately change the declared policy.
Investigate the evidence. REVIEW is not a weak PASS.
In the controlled HOLD workflow, GitHub reports HIGH and Telegraph reports CRITICAL for CVE-2026-4800. Limen returns REVIEW rather than silently choosing one source.
How it works
The release change establishes the context to evaluate.
GitHub and Dependency Review identify the relevant package facts.
Telegraph receives a paid CVE_LOOKUP request when evidence is needed.
The repository policy compares source-specific evidence against its rules.
PASS, HOLD or REVIEW returns to the GitHub workflow.
The evidence path becomes durable and may be published as a receipt.
Architecture honesty
GitHub establishes repository context. Telegraph supplies separately routed CVE evidence. Limen applies release policy.
A Telegraph response alone never proves repository exploitability.Receipt / provenance
Limen can persist the evidence path and publish a sanitized receipt without exposing the private ledger behind it.
LM-REC-B1306724D0B84B6EBDDF7E36Release evidence gate
Controlled demo / Base Sepolia / Telegraph CVE_LOOKUP